Should we stop trying to measure the business impact of training and development?

Measuring with measurng tape
andresr/iStock
Brought to you by
Track logo
Share this content

The number of articles and discussions on L&D ROI is huge, a testament to the fact that as a profession we are still working through possible solutions and options. It's no doubt a challenge, and can be difficult, confusing and complicated. In this article Jo Ayoubi, CEO of Track Surveys, looks at how we can make progress in this area.

The big questions include:

  • Is it really possible to measure the effect of training or development, and if so, is it practical?
  • How can you remove the effect of other factors from your measurement (the economy, competition, changing customer requirements, productivity, and management issues)?
  • How do you measure difficult-to-measure areas which we know have an effect – like good management – but how much effect do they have?
  • Is organisational success measured purely in financial terms? If it is, then how do you translate culture, good management, ethics, high performing teams and leadership into pounds and pence? And if it’s not just about finances, then what is it about? 

Let’s try for added-value first

It’s clear that as L&D professionals, we need somehow to prove the value we are adding – because if nothing else, ‘the boss wants it’. Before ROI though, there’s the interim step of adding value.

If you agree with the 70/20/10 model, formal training and development programmes constitute only 10% of all learning – but because these programmes tend to be the most costly and high-profile interventions, it’s crucial to establish their value.

Which also begs the question as to how we measure the impact and value of informal and on the job learning, that vital 90% that’s going on all the time.

There are two simple elements to this puzzle:

  • deciding what to measure
  • doing the measurement.

Deciding what to measure

When designing our training interventions, we need to link the outcomes directly to a strategic goal – through analysing and understanding what drives individuals and teams to behave in such a way as to bring about that strategic goal.  

In a case study at a US bank, their approach was to ‘determine primary program goals and ensure a link to corporate goals’. By doing this, they built in the critical element that would connect an improvement in corporate goals (which are measurable) to the training that took place.

This is easier to do, of course, where the corporate goals are financial, or about processes, savings, sales etc.

But this approach works equally well for ‘soft skills’; a company that wanted to show the value of a leadership programme innovatively asked the participants to find one, two or three measures that would improve if they improved the use of specific leadership competencies with their team.

So not only were they able to then measure the improvements, they were also able to see how important those leadership competencies were to their success, and to the success of their teams.

Doing the measurement

The measurement of the agreed outcomes needs to be consistent, regular and ongoing. In my experience, it’s often just the practical issues of doing this that make it a chore for L&D departments. And that’s where the latest technology can help.

There are easy-to-use online tools available right now that will allow you to set up regular surveys and feedback questionnaires that can go out automatically to individuals, their managers, their colleagues and their customers.

The content of these tools can be adapted to measure the specific goals, activities or behaviours that the learning is meant to impact.

And reporting should be automatic and show you the ongoing results in an easy-to-view format – so you can see at a glance where the value has been added by the training, and where it might need to be adjusted for further added value.

So we can measure the impact of learning, but we have to do it in the right way

We can only measure learning itself up to a point, through anecdote, self-assessment and testing.

To measure the impact of that learning, we have to look at outcomes, activities and behaviours. So linking the learning to those outcomes, and benchmarking those outcomes now, then regularly in the future, is probably the most effective way to measure added value of training and development in the real world. 

About Jo Ayoubi

Jo Ayoubi

Jo Ayoubi is CEO and co-founder of Track Surveys. Prior to Track, Jo was a learning and development director for the Corporate Finance business at Ernst & Young in London, where she was responsible for the training and development of over a thousand corporate finance professionals. Projects included learning management systems and online learning evaluations.

At Track, Jo has advised on, and led the development of 360 and other online applications for leading organisations including John Lewis Partnership, Waitrose, Baker & McKenzie, Nuffield Health, Fujitsu and Saudi Telecom.

She has also facilitated partnership programmes with people development companies including Cambridge-based Moller Professional Services Group.

Jo is the author of The Consultants’ Guide to Success with 360 Degree Feedback, and holds Bachelors (first class) and Masters degrees in French, Arabic & Politics.

Jo writes and blogs regularly on the topic of 360 Degree Feedback in performance and learning. Her recent papers include ‘Making Your 360 Degree Feedback more effective in delivering successful behavioural change’, and ‘Which Online 360? A 10-step checklist for choosing an online 360 Degree Feedback system’, published in association with Training Zone UK. Outside Track, Jo makes time to mentor students at Woodhouse College in London.

Replies

Please login or register to join the discussion.

13th Jun 2017 07:03

I like this article. really effective for me....

Thanks (0)