Founder & Managing Partner Taffinder Consulting
Share this content

Iconoclastic leaders: how to execute digital innovation

To be truly innovative, leaders need to be willing to break the rules – but it needs to be done constructively, rather than for innovation’s own sake if you want it to be effective. 

4th Mar 2020
Founder & Managing Partner Taffinder Consulting
Share this content
Abstract colorful grid surrounded by glowing particles
iStock/piranka

An error frequently made by executives in trying to change their organisations, is that they focus too much on setting out and pursuing new directions, new organisational structures or ways of working, transformed processes and so on. There is nothing wrong in this per se, but if executives strive only for the new without inflicting, as I set out in my latest book The Leadership Crash Course, 'constructive damage to the status quo', then they are leaving barriers that will be a drag on change and innovation.

Too often today we see leaders of businesses and IT functions and innovation teams committing huge effort and investment to digitising old processes, rather than transforming into a digital way of operating – a digital business model. 

John Chisholm was the chief executive who transformed the Defence Evaluation and Research Agency from a costly and bureaucratic snail in British defence technology to a profitable, world-class tiger, later called QinetiQ. He described the issue succinctly, saying: “innovation is inherently iconoclastic: it's something that breaks rules”.

Iconoclasm – the tearing down of the old, the smashing of rules, and the overturning of conventional wisdom – is at least as important a set of leadership actions as those of a positive, constructive intent.

Not doing constructive damage permits old ways of operating to retain their force and for people to stick to them and avoid opportunity, innovation and risk. This is known as the ‘sunk cost effect’, the tendency for humans to persist in something that clearly isn’t working because they have already invested something in it (time, effort, money) and they want to avoid both waste and failure.

Learning to ‘fail fast’

The new idea from the software and tech development world of ‘failing fast’ was based on being pragmatic about failure. The knowledge teams gain from a failed attempt actually increases the probability of ultimate success. Author Eric Ries, in his 2011 book The Lean Startup first championed this approach.

Doing constructive damage, therefore, means forcing or triggering new, innovative behaviour at the individual level by:

  • Doing away with specific policies, processes or ways of working.
  • Changing the composition of work groups so that people from different departments or teams who would normally never interact work closely together.
  • Targeting benchmarks from areas or industries completely different to the conventionally accepted.
  • Overtly and consistently by-passing bureaucratic ways of working dominant in the culture.

Each of these tactics is aimed at triggering in people, faced with the imminent demise of many of the old ways of working, the urgency to find or create alternative, innovative solutions – critically, solutions that are not simply reiterations of the old, conventional ways of operating.

Too often today we see leaders of businesses and IT functions and innovation teams committing huge effort and investment to digitising old processes, rather than transforming into a digital way of operating – a digital business model. This is simply a slow way to spend a lot of money but still remain fixed into traditional ways of running the operation.

Doing damage to the status quo should never happen in a vacuum, however. As a leader, your crystal clear articulation of the value you are trying to create through purpose and context is what will supply the steer to your people. It will set the parameters within which they need to operate, the guidance that ensures that whatever innovations or changes they create are aligned towards the shared objectives you want them to pursue.

Doing damage to the status quo is, of course, difficult and uncomfortable for leaders. Some leaders can become so risk-averse on the basis of a single uncomfortable experience that they allow the experience to bleed into the culture of the enterprise.

Formalising innovation: tactical, radical, and exploratory

Adherence to the status quo and clinging onto conventional ways of operating are very natural human behaviours. They provide stability, clarity of understanding and lower stress. If innovation is a high priority, you will need to raise the bar on investment and activities that change the context and therefore encourage experimentation, challenge and novelty. This will not be achieved purely through exhortations or influence.

Too many CEOs and departmental leaders are guilty of innovation ‘virtue-signaling’ when trying to prove to the market or shareholders – or even their own employees – that they are committed to innovation.

Firstly, be clear that innovation in a business context is the process of developing novel ideas that are commercialised (i.e. that can be monetised in revenue or profit or that result in value that is measurable, such as speed, fewer errors, lower cost and so on).

Secondly, you need a framework. As an executive, one of the ways I have used to kick-start and embed innovation is to commit investment and resource at three levels of innovation:

  • Tactical: new ways of doing things or developing improved products and services that in the mainstream businesses produce additional revenue, greater efficiencies or higher profitability – but do not result in a change in the business model.
     
  • Radical: process or product/service transformations that in time create breakpoint advantages through a shift in the business model in a business unit or the organisation as a whole.
     
  • Exploratory: broad discovery-oriented experimentation, either in the businesses or in collaboration with an innovation team that may produce radical or tactical innovations.

The emphasis of this approach is to ensure that investment and activity is taking place in all three of these innovation levels at the same time. This is very important because it maximises the opportunities for both tactical improvements (which help short-to-medium term efficiency gains or profitability uplift) and radical change (which drives medium-longer term business model transformations that secure strategic competitive advantage or defenses against market erosion and commoditization).

Real world lessons in successful innovation

There is a great deal of misunderstanding of how to innovate in businesses. Too many CEOs and departmental leaders are guilty of innovation ‘virtue-signaling’ when trying to prove to the market or shareholders – or even their own employees – that they are committed to innovation.

Fortunately, there are real-world lessons to make the innovation framework set out above really effective. Leaders should implement the following guidelines:

  1.  Ensure you have executives who are supportive of innovation at the top of the business, but also managers in the middle levels where day-to-day decisions get made. It is in the middle levels of management that innovation can be strangled.
     
  2. Remember that innovation is collaboration. It cannot be done successfully if it is confined to a ‘digital garage’ or the ‘innovation hub’. People in different parts of the business (from front-line to middle and back-office) need to work together.
     
  3. Invest directly and prioritise pursuing a few ‘big bets’, whilst running more mid-range ideas and initiatives, plus a broad set of incremental experiments that may or may not come off but feed the pool of downstream winning programmes.
     
  4. Set looser budget and performance metrics for innovation programmes, than apply for business-as-usual investments. There is always a temptation to be gung-ho about strict returns on investment, but innovation is different. The fail-fast philosophy is relevant and learning must be encouraged. Rigid financial rules can kill innovation.

Deliberately aim to build close connections between the innovators and the front-line business people, even if this means appointing someone in a role to force integration and collaboration. Organisations frequently make the error of developing great innovative initiatives with strong leadership from the top that fail to gain traction because teams in the businesses do not have the time, inclination or buy-in to execute the initiative.  

book cover of paul taffinder bookThis article is an excerpt from The leadership crash course: creating leadership impact in the digital world by Paul Taffinder.

Replies (0)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

There are currently no replies, be the first to post a reply.